Tech & Counsel

Foundations for counsel

A lawyer cannot write policy for a field they do not understand.

Many young lawyers want a technology practice. They can recite the Nigeria Data Protection Act and the shape of a contract. They freeze when a product manager says the token lives in Redis, the webhook failed, or user acceptance testing was deemed accepted.

Tech & Counsel teaches the technical layer first — stacks, the development lifecycle, Git, APIs, data flows, cookies, and testing — so you can draft privacy and cookie policies that match the product, negotiate technology contracts with your eyes open, and follow a software dispute without borrowing someone else’s vocabulary.

Tech & Counsel provides education only. Nothing on this site is legal advice, and nothing here creates a solicitor–client relationship.

Abstract navy plate standing in for a counsel’s desk
Plate 01 · The work starts before the clauseReplace this photograph later

How the path works

Four movements, then the clause.

See the modules
  1. 01

    Name the system

    Frontend, backend, database, and where the software actually lives. If you cannot draw the stack, you cannot describe it in a policy.

  2. 02

    Follow how it is built

    Waterfall and Agile, Git history, pull requests, and the moment a third-party API becomes your client’s problem.

  3. 03

    Map the data

    Sit with the product manager. Match every field on a screen to a place it is stored, a person who can read it, and a reason it exists.

  4. 04

    Draft with the product in view

    Privacy notices, cookie choices, SLAs, acceptance criteria, and the questions you can defend in a product meeting or a hearing.

The sentence that freezes the room

Doctrine does not translate a product meeting.

“We store tokens in Redis.”
A cache is not a filing cabinet, and a session is not a record of consent.
“The webhook failed.”
The payment company spoke. Your client’s server did not hear it. Liability follows the silence.
“UAT was deemed accepted.”
A clock in the contract can finish a project that nobody has signed.

What goes wrong

Ambition without a picture of the system.

A copied privacy policy names data the product does not collect and stays silent about the SDK that does. An SLA promises a percentage nobody has tied to hours. A third-party payments API fails, and the contract still speaks as if the client built the rails. User acceptance testing is a sentence — “successful completion” — and a year later the argument is whether the system was finished or stalled.

The path is modular and written for lawyers. You leave able to ask better questions in a product meeting, to draft a privacy or cookie notice that could survive a conversation with the person who built the feature, and to read a technology dispute without treating the engineering record as decoration.

This is not a law firm, a pupillage, or a live advice desk. Phase 1 does not issue a qualification.

Begin with the stack.

The account is free. The reading is yours. Progress waits until your email is confirmed.